The Origin of Freemasonry
Thomas Paine, 1818
IT is always understood that Free-Masons have a secret which they carefully
conceal; but from every thing that can be collected from their own accounts
of Masonry, their real secret is no other than their origin, which but
few of them understand; and those who do, envelope it in mystery
The Society of Masons are distinguished into three classes or degrees.
1st. The Entered Apprentice. 2d. The Fellow Craft. 3d. The Master Mason.
The Entered Apprentice knows but little more of Masonry than the use of
signs and tokens, and certain steps and words by which Masons can recognize
each other without being discovered by a person who is not a Mason. The
Fellow Craft is not much better instructed in Masonry, than the Entered
Apprentice. It is only in the Master Mason's Lodge, that whatever knowledge
remains of the origin of Masonry is preserved and concealed.
In 1730, Samuel Pritchard, member of a constituted lodge in England, published
a treatise entitled Masonry Dissected; and made oath before the Lord Mayor
of London that it was a true copy. "Samuel Pritchard maketh oath that
the copy hereunto annexed is a true and genuine copy in every particular." In
his work he has given the catechism or examination, in question and answer,
of the Apprentices, the Fellow Craft, and the Master Mason. There was no
difficulty in doing this, as it is mere form.
In his introduction he says, "the original institution of Masonry
consisted in the foundation of the liberal arts and sciences, but more
especially in Geometry, for at the building of the tower of Babel, the
art and mystery of Masonry was first introduced, and from thence handed
down by Euclid, a worthy and excellent mathematician of the Egyptians;
and he communicated it to Hiram, the Master Mason concerned in building
Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem."
Besides the absurdity of deriving Masonry from the building of Babel,
where, according to the story, the confusion of languages prevented the
builders understanding each other, and consequently of communicating any
knowledge they had, there is a glaring contradiction in point of chronology
in the account he gives.
Solomon's Temple was built and dedicated 1004 years before the christian
era; and Euclid, as may be seen in the tables of chronology, lived 277
before the same era. It was therefore impossible that Euclid could communicate
any thing to Hiram, since Euclid did not live till 700 years after the
time of Hiram.
In 1783, Captain George Smith, inspector of the Royal Artillery Academy
at Woolwich, in England, and Provincial Grand Master of Masonry for the
county of Kent, published a treatise entitled, The Use and Abuse of Free-Masonry.
In his chapter of the antiquity of Masonry, he makes it to be coeval with
creation, "when," says he, "the sovereign architect raised
on Masonic principles the beauteous globe, and commanded the master science,
Geometry, to lay the planetary world, and to regulate by its laws the whole
stupendous system in just unerring proportion, rolling round the central
sun."
"But," continues he, "I am not at liberty publicly to undraw
the curtain, and openly to descant on this head; it is sacred, and ever
will remain so; those who are honored with the trust will not reveal it,
and those who are ignorant of it cannot betray it." By this last part
of the phrase, Smith means the two inferior classes, the Fellow Craft and
the Entered Apprentice, for he says in the next page of his work, "It
is not every one that is barely initiated into Free-Masonry that is entrusted
with all the mysteries thereto belonging; they are not attainable as things
of course, nor by every capacity."
The learned, but unfortunate Doctor Dodd, Grand Chaplain of Masonry, in
his oration at the dedication of Free-Mason's Hall, London, traces Masonry
through a variety of stages. Masons, says he, are well informed from their
own private and interior records that the building of Solomon's Temple
is an important era, from whence they derive many mysteries of their art. "Now
(says he,) be it remembered that this great event took place above 1000
years before the Christian era, and consequently more than a century before
Homer, the first of the Grecian Poets, wrote; and above five centuries
before Pythagoras brought from the east his sublime system of truly masonic
instruction to illuminate. our western world. But, remote as this period
is, we date not from thence the commencement of our art. For though it
might owe to the wise and glorious King of Israel some of its many mystic
forms and hieroglyphic ceremonies, yet certainly the art itself is coeval
with man, the great subject of it. "We trace," continues he, "its
footsteps in the most distant, the most remote ages and nations of the
world. We find it among the first and most celebrated civilizers of the
East. We deduce it regularly from the first astronomers on the plains of
Chaldea, to the wise and mystic kings and priests of Egypt, the sages of
Greece, and the philosophers of Rome."
From these reports and declarations of Masons of the highest order in
the institution, we see that Masonry, without publicly declaring so, lays
claim to some divine communication from the creator, in a manner different
from, and unconnected with, the book which the christians call the bible;
and the natural result from this is, that Masonry is derived from some
very ancient religion, wholly independent of and unconnected with that
book.
To come then at once to the point, Masonry (as I shall show from the customs,
ceremonies, hieroglyphics, and chronology of Masonry) is derived and is
the remains of the religion of the ancient Druids; who, like the Magi of
Persia and the Priests of Heliopolis in Egypt, were Priests of the Sun.
They paid worship to this great luminary, as the great visible agent of
a great invisible first cause whom they styled " Time without limits." [NOTE:
Zarvan-Akarana. This personification of Boundless Time, though a part of
Parsee Theology, seems to be a later monotheistic dogma, based on perversions
of the Zendavesta. See Haug's "Religion of the Parsees." -- Editor.]
The christian religion and Masonry have one and the same common origin:
both are derived from the worship of the Sun. The difference between their
origin is, that the christian religion is a parody on the worship of the
Sun, in which they put a man whom they call Christ, in the place of the
Sun, and pay him the same adoration which was originally paid to the Sun,
as I have shown in the chapter on the origin of the Christian religion.
[NOTE: Referring to an unpublished portion of the work of which this chapter
forms a part. -- American Editor, 1819 [This paragraph is omitted from
the pamphlet copyrighted by Madame Bonneville in 1810, as also is the last
sentence of the next paragraph. -- Editor.]
In Masonry many of the ceremonies of the Druids are preserved in their
original state, at least without any parody. With them the Sun is still
the Sun; and his image, in the form of the sun is the great emblematical
ornament of Masonic Lodges and Masonic dresses. It is the central figure
on their aprons, and they wear it also pendant on the breast in their lodges,
and in their processions. It has the figure of a man, as at the head of
the sun, as Christ is always represented.
At what period of antiquity, or in what nation, this religion was first
established, is lost in the labyrinth of unrecorded time. It is generally
ascribed to the ancient Egyptians, the Babylonians and Chaldeans, and reduced
afterwards to a system regulated by the apparent progress of the sun through
the twelve signs of Zodiac by Zoroaster the law giver of Persia, from whence
Pythagoras brought it into Greece. It is to these matters Dr. Dodd refers
in the passage already quoted from his oration.
The worship of the Sun as the great visible agent of a great invisible
first cause, "Time without limits," spread itself over a considerable
part of Asia and Africa, from thence to Greece and Rome, through all ancient
Gaul, and into Britain and Ireland.
Smith, in his chapter on the antiquity of Masonry in Britain, says, that "notwithstanding
the obscurity which envelopes Masonic history in that country, various
circumstances contribute to prove that Free-Masonry was introduced into
Britain about 1030 Years before Christ." It cannot be Masonry in its
present state that Smith here alludes to. The Druids flourished in Britain
at the period he speaks of, and it is from them that Masonry is descended.
Smith has put the child in the place of the parent.
It sometimes happens, as well in writing as in conversation, that a person
lets slip an expression that serves to unravel what he intends to conceal,
and this is the case with Smith, for in the same chapter he says, "The
Druids, when they committed any thing to writing, used the Greek alphabet,
and I am bold to assert that the most perfect remains of the Druids' rites
and ceremonies are preserved in the customs and ceremonies of the Masons
that are to be found existing among mankind." "My brethren" says
he, "may be able to trace them with greater exactness than I am at
liberty to explain to the public."
This is a confession from a Master Mason, without intending it to be so
understood by the public, that Masonry is the remains of the religion of
the Druids; the reasons for the Masons keeping this a secret I shall explain
in the course of this work.
As the study and contemplation of the Creator [is] in the works of the
creation, the Sun, as the great visible agent of that Being, was the visible
object of the adoration of Druids; all their religious rites and ceremonies
had reference to the apparent progress of the Sun through the twelve signs
of the Zodiac, and his influence upon the earth. The Masons adopt the same
practices. The roof of their Temples or Lodges is ornamented with a Sun,
and the floor is a representation of the variegated face of the earth either
by carpeting or Mosaic work.
Free Masons Hall, in Great Queen-street, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London,
is a magnificent building, and cost upwards of 12,000 pounds sterling.
Smith, in speaking of this building, says (page 152,) "The roof of
this magnificent Hall is in all probability the highest piece of finished
architecture in Europe. In the center of this roof, a most resplendent
Sun is represented in burnished gold, surrounded with the twelve signs
of the Zodiac, with their respective characters;
Aries Libra Taurus Scorpio Gemini Sagittarius Cancer Capricorns Leo Aquarius
Virgo Pisces After giving this description, he says, "The emblematical
meaning of the Sun is well known to the enlightened and inquisitive Free-Mason;
and as the real Sun is situated in the center of the universe, so the emblematical
Sun is the center of real Masonry. We all know (continues he) that the
Sun is the fountain of light, the source of the seasons, the cause of the
vicissitudes of day and night, the parent of vegetation, the friend of
man; hence the scientific Free-Mason only knows the reason why the Sun
is placed in the center of this beautiful hall."
The Masons, in order to protect themselves from the persecution of the
christian church, have always spoken in a mystical manner of the figure
of the Sun in their Lodges, or, like the astronomer Lalande, who is a Mason,
been silent upon the subject. It is their secret, especially in Catholic
countries, because the figure of the Sun is the expressive criterion that
denotes they are descended from the Druids, and that wise, elegant, philosophical
religion, was the faith opposite to the faith of the gloomy Christian church.
[NOTE: This sentence is omitted in Madame Bonneville's publication. --
Editor.]
The Lodges of the Masons, if built for the purpose, are constructed in
a manner to correspond with the apparent motion of the Sun. They are situated
East and West. [NOTE: The Freemason's Hall in London, which Paine has correctly
described, is situated North and South, the exigencies of the space having
been too strong for Masonic orthodoxy. Though nominally eastward the Master
stands at the South. -- Editor.] The master's place is always in the East.
In the examination of an Entered Apprentice, the Master, among many other
questions, asks him,
Q: How is the lodge situated?
A: East and West.
Q: Why so?
A: Because all churches and chapels are, or ought to be so."
This answer, which is mere catechismal form, is not an answer to the question.
It does no more than remove the question a point further, which is, why
ought all churches and chapels to be so? But as the Entered Apprentice
is not initiated into the druidical mysteries of Masonry, he is not asked
any questions a direct answer to which would lead thereto.
Q: Where stands your Master?
A: In the East.
Q: Why so?
A: As the Sun rises in the East and opens the day, so the Master stands in
the East, (with his right hand upon his left breast, being a sign, and the
square about his neck,) to open the Lodge, and set his men at work.
Q: Where stand your Wardens?
A: In the West.
Q: What is their business?
A: As the Sun sets in the West to close the day, so the Wardens stand in the
West, (with their right hands upon their left breasts, being a sign, and the
level and plumb rule about their necks,) to close the Lodge, and dismiss the
men from labor, paying them their wages."
Here the name of the Sun is mentioned, but it is proper to observe that
in this place it has reference only to labor or to the time of labor, and
not to any religious druidical rite or ceremony, as it would have with
respect to the situation of Lodges East and West. I have already observed
in the chapter on the origin of the christian religion, that the situation
of churches East and West is taken from the worship of the Sun, which rises
in the east, and has not the least reference to the person called Jesus
Christ. The christians never bury their dead on the North side of a church;
[NOTE: In many parts of Northern Europe the North was supposed to be the
region of demons. Executed criminals were buried on the north side of churches.
-- Editor.] and a Mason's Lodge always has, or is supposed to have, three
windows which are called fixed lights, to distinguish them from the moveable
lights of the Sun and the Moon. The Master asks the Entered Apprentice,
Q: How are they (the fixed lights) situated?
A: East, West, and South.
Q: What are their uses?
A: To light the men to and from their work.
Q: Why are there no lights in the North?
A: Because the Sun darts no rays from thence."
This, among numerous other instances, shows that the christian religion
and Masonry have one and the same common origin, the ancient worship of
the Sun.
The high festival of the Masons is on the day they call St. John's day;
but every enlightened Mason must know that holding their festival on this
day has no reference to the person called St. John, and that it is only
to disguise the true cause of holding it on this day, that they call the
day by that name. As there were Masons, or at least Druids, many centuries
before the time of St. John, if such person ever existed, the holding their
festival on this day must refer to some cause totally unconnected with
John.
The case is, that the day called St. John's day, is the 24th of June,
and is what is called Midsummer-day. The sun is then arrived at the summer
solstice; and, with respect to his meridional altitude, or height at high
noon, appears for some days to be of the same height. The astronomical
longest day, like the shortest day, is not every year, on account of leap
year, on the same numerical day, and therefore the 24th of June is always
taken for Midsummer-day; and it is in honor of the sun, which has then
arrived at his greatest height in our hemisphere, and not any thing with
respect to St. John, that this annual festival of the Masons, taken from
the Druids, is celebrated on Midsummer-day.
Customs will often outlive the remembrance of their origin, and this is
the case with respect to a custom still practiced in Ireland, where the
Druids flourished at the time they flourished in Britain. On the eve of
Saint John's day, that is, on the eve of Midsummer-day, the Irish light
fires on the tops of the hills. This can have no reference to St. John;
but it has emblematical reference to the sun, which on that day is at his
highest summer elevation, and might in common language be said to have
arrived at the top of the hill.
As to what Masons, and books of Masonry, tell us of Solomon's Temple at
Jerusalem, it is no wise improbable that some Masonic ceremonies may have
been derived from the building of that temple, for the worship of the Sun
was in practice many centuries before the Temple existed, or before the
Israelites came out of Egypt. And we learn from the history of the Jewish
Kings, 2 Kings xxii. xxiii. that the worship of the Sun was performed by
the Jews in that Temple. It is, however, much to be doubted if it was done
with the same scientific purity and religious morality with which it was
performed by the Druids, who, by all accounts that historically remain
of them, were a wise, learned, and moral class of men. The Jews, on the
contrary, were ignorant of astronomy, and of science in general, and if
a religion founded upon astronomy fell into their hands, it is almost certain
it would be corrupted. We do not read in the history of the Jews, whether
in the Bible or elsewhere, that they were the inventors or the improvers
of any one art or science. Even in the building of this temple, the Jews
did not know how to square and frame the timber for beginning and carrying
on the work, and Solomon was obliged to send to Hiram, King of Tyre (Zidon)
to procure workmen; "for thou knowest, (says Solomon to Hiram, i Kings
v. 6.) that there is not among us any that can skill to hew timber like
unto the Zidonians." This temple was more properly Hiram's Temple
than Solomon's, and if the Masons derive any thing from the building of
it, they owe it to the Zidonians and not to the Jews. -- But to return
to the worship of the Sun in this Temple.
It is said, 2 Kings xxiii. 5, "And [king Josiah] put down all the
idolatrous priests ... that burned incense unto ... the sun, the moon,
the planets, and all the host of heaven." And it is said at the 11th
verse: "And he took away the horses that the kings of Judah had given
to the Sun, at the entering in of the house of the Lord, ... and burned
the chariots of the Sun with fire"; verse 13, "And the high places
that were before Jerusalem, which were on the right hand of the mount of
corruption, which Solomon the king of Israel had builded for Ashtoreth,
the abomination of the Zidonians" (the very people that built the
temple) "did the king defile."
Besides these things, the description that Josephus gives of the decorations
of this Temple, resembles on a large scale those of a Mason's Lodge. He
says that the distribution of the several parts of the Temple of the Jews
represented all nature, particularly the parts most apparent of it, as
the sun, the moon, the planets, the zodiac, the earth, the elements; and
that the system of the world was retraced there by numerous ingenious emblems.
These, in all probability, are, what Josiah, in his ignorance, calls the
abominations of the Zidonians. [NOTE by PAINE: Smith, in speaking of a
Lodge, says, when the Lodge is revealed to an entering Mason, it discovers
to him a representation of the World; in which, from the wonders of nature,
we are led to contemplate her great original, and worship him from his
mighty works; and we are thereby also moved to exercise those moral and
social virtues which become mankind as the servants of the great Architect
of the world. -- Thomas Paine, 1818.] Every thing, however, drawn from
this Temple [NOTE by PAINE: It may not be improper here to observe, that
the law called the law of Moses could not have been in existence at the
time of building this Temple. Here is the likeness of things in heaven
above and in earth beneath. And we read in I Kings vi., vii., that Solomon
made cherubs and cherubims, that he carved all the walls of the house round
about with cherubims, and palm-trees, and open flowers, and that he made
a molten sea, placed on twelve oxen, and the ledges of it were ornamented
with lions, oxen, and cherubims: all this is contrary to the law called
the law of Moses. -- Thomas Paine, 1818.] and applied to Masonry, still
refers to the worship of the Sun, however corrupted or misunderstood by
the Jews, and consequently to the religion of the Druids.
Another circumstance, which shows that Masonry is derived from some ancient
system, prior to and unconnected with the christian religion, is the chronology,
or method of counting time, used by the Masons in the records of their
Lodges. They make no use of what is called the christian era; and they
reckon their months numerically, as the ancient Egyptians did, and as the
Quakers do now. I have by me, a record of a French Lodge, at the time the
late Duke of Orleans, then Duke de Chartres, was Grand Master of Masonry
in France. It begins as follows: "Le trentieme jour du sixieme mois
de l'an de la V.L. cinq mille sept cent soixante treize;" that is,
the thirteenth day of the sixth month of the year of the Venerable Lodge,
five thousand seven hundred and seventy-three. By what I observe in English
books of Masonry, the English Masons use the initials A.L. and not V.L.
By A.L. they mean in the year of Light, as the Christians by A.D. mean
in the year of our Lord. But A.L. like V.L. refers to the same chronological
era, that is, to the supposed time of the creation. [NOTE: V.L. are the
initials of Vraie Lumiere, true light; and A.L. of Anne Lucis, in the year
of light. This and the three preceding sentences (of the text) are suppressed
in Madame Bonneville's pamphlet, 1810. -- Editor.] In the chapter on the
origin of the Christian religion, I have shown that the Cosmogony, that
is, the account of the creation with which the book of Genesis opens, has
been taken and mutilated from the Zend-Avesta of Zoroaster, and was fixed
as a preface to the Bible after the Jews returned from captivity in Babylon,
and that the Robbins of the Jews do not hold their account in Genesis to
be a fact, but mere allegory. The six thousand years in the Zend-Avesta,
is changed or interpolated into six days in the account of Genesis. The
Masons appear to have chosen the same period, and perhaps to avoid the
suspicion and persecution of the Church, have adopted the era of the world,
as the era of Masonry. The V.L. of the French, and A.L. of the English
Mason, answer to the A.M. Anno Mundi, or year of the world.
Though the Masons have taken many of their ceremonies and hieroglyphics
from the ancient Egyptians, it is certain they have not taken their chronology
from thence. If they had, the church would soon have sent them to the stake;
as the chronology of the Egyptians, like that of the Chinese, goes many
thousand years beyond the Bible chronology.
The religion of the Druids, as before said, was the same as the religion
of the ancient Egyptians. The priests of Egypt were the professors and
teachers of science, and were styled priests of Heliopolis, that is, of
the City of the Sun. The Druids in Europe, who were the same order of men,
have their name from the Teutonic or ancient German language; the German
being anciently called Teutones. The word Druid signifies a wise man. [NOTE:
German drud, wizard. Cf. Milton's line: "The star-led wizards haste
with odours sweet." The word Druid has also been derived from Greek
####;, an oak; Celtic 'deru,' an oak and 'ndd,' lord; British 'deruidhon,'
very wise men; Heb. 'derussim,' contemplators; etc. -- Editor.] In Persia
they were called Magi, which signifies the same thing.
Egypt," says Smith, "from whence we derive many of our mysteries,
has always borne a distinguished rank in history, and was once celebrated
above all others for its antiquities, learning, opulence, and fertility.
In their system, their principal hero- gods, Osiris and Isis, theologically
represented the Supreme Being and universal Nature; and physically the
two great celestial luminaries, the Sun and the Moon, by whose influence
all nature was actuated." "The experienced brethren of the society,
[says Smith in a note to this passage] are well informed what affinity
these symbols bear to Masonry, and why they are used in all Masonic Lodges." In
speaking of the apparel of the Masons in their Lodges, part of which, as
we see in their public processions, is a white leather apron, he says, "the
Druids were apparelled in white at the time of their sacrifices and solemn
offices. The Egyptian priests of Osiris wore snow-white cotton. The Grecian
and most other priests wore white garments. As Masons, we regard the principles
of those 'who were the first worshipers of the true God,' imitate their
apparel, and assume the badge of innocence."
"The Egyptians," continues Smith, "in the earliest ages
constituted a great number of Lodges, but with assiduous care kept their
secrets of Masonry from all strangers. These secrets have been imperfectly
handed down to us by oral tradition only, and ought to be kept undiscovered
to the laborers, craftsmen, and apprentices, till by good behavior and
long study they become better acquainted in geometry and the liberal arts,
and thereby qualified for Masters and Wardens, which is seldom or never
the case with English Masons."
Under the head of Free-Masonry, written by the astronomer Lalande, in
the French Encyclopedia, I expected from his great knowledge in astronomy,
to have found much information on the origin of Masonry; for what connection
can there be between any institution and the Sun and twelve signs of the
Zodiac, if there be not something in that institution, or in its origin,
that has reference to astronomy? Every thing used as an hieroglyphic has
reference to the subject and purpose for which it is used; and we are not
to suppose the Free-Masons, among whom are many very learned and scientific
men, to be such idiots as to make use of astronomical signs without some
astronomical purpose. But I was much disappointed in my expectation from
Lalande. In speaking of the origin of Masonry, he says, "L'orgine
de la maconnerie se Perd, comme tant d'autres, dans l'obscurite des termps;" That
is, the origin of Masonry, like many others, loses itself in the obscurity
of time. When I came to this expression, I supposed Lalande a Mason, and
on enquiry found he was. This passing over saved him from the embarrassment
which Masons are under respecting the disclosure of their origin, and which
they are sworn to conceal. There is a society of Masons in Dublin who take
the name of Druids; these Masons must be supposed to have a reason for
taking that name.
I come now to speak of the cause of secrecy used by the Masons.
The natural source of secrecy is fear. When any new religion over-runs
a former religion, the professors of the new become the persecutors of
the old. We see this in all instances that history brings before us. When
Hilkiah the priest and Shaphan the scribe, in the reign of King Josiah,
found, or pretended to find, the law, called the law of Moses, a thousand
years after the time of Moses, (and it does not appear from 2 Kings, xxii.,
xxiii., that such a law was ever practiced or known before the time of
Josiah), he established that law as a national religion, and put all the
priests of the Sun to death. When the christian religion over-ran the Jewish
religion, the Jews were the continual subject of persecution in all christian
countries. When the Protestant religion in England over-ran the Roman Catholic
religion, it was made death for a Catholic priest to be found in England.
As this has been the case in all the instances we have any knowledge of,
we are obliged to admit it with respect to the case in question, and that
when the christian religion over-ran the religion of the Druids in Italy,
ancient Gaul, Britain, and Ireland, the Druids became the subject of persecution.
This would naturally and necessarily oblige such of them as remained attached
to their original religion to meet in secret, and under the strongest injunctions
of secrecy. Their safety depended upon it. A false brother might expose
the lives of many of them to destruction; and from the remains of the religion
of the Druids, thus preserved, arose the institution which, to avoid the
name of Druid, took that of Mason, and practiced under this new name the
rites and ceremonies of Druids.
|
